You are able to avoid two calls to the bookmaker and lock in today’s line on a later game by telling your bookmaker you wish to make an “if” bet. “If” bets can also be made on two games kicking off at the same time. The bookmaker will wait before first game is over. If the initial game wins, he will put the same amount on the 2nd game though it had been played.

Although an “if” bet is actually two straight bets at normal vig, you cannot decide later that you no longer want the 2nd bet. When you make an “if” bet, the 2nd bet can’t be cancelled, even when the 2nd game has not gone off yet. If the initial game wins, you will have action on the 2nd game. For this reason, there is less control over an “if” bet than over two straight bets. When the two games you bet overlap over time, however, the only way to bet one as long as another wins is by placing an “if” bet. Obviously, when two games overlap over time, cancellation of the 2nd game bet is not an issue. It must be noted, that after the two games start at different times, most books won’t allow you to fill in the 2nd game later. You should designate both teams whenever you make the bet.

You possibly can make an “if” bet by saying to the bookmaker, “I wish to make an ‘if’ bet,” and then, “Give me Team A IF Team B for $100.” Giving your bookmaker that instruction will be the identical to betting $110 to win $100 on Team A, and then, as long as Team A wins, betting another $110 to win $100 on Team B.

If the initial team in the “if” bet loses, there is no bet on the 2nd team. Regardless of whether the 2nd team wins of loses, your total loss on the “if” bet would be $110 whenever you lose on the initial team. If the initial team wins, however, you’d have a bet of $110 to win $100 going on the 2nd team. For the reason that case, if the 2nd team loses, your total loss would be just the $10 of vig on the split of the two teams. If both games win, you’d win $100 on Team A and $100 on Team B, for an overall total win of $200. Thus, the maximum loss on an “if” would be $110, and the maximum win would be $200. This really is balanced by the disadvantage of losing the full $110, instead of just $10 of vig, everytime the teams split with the initial team in the bet losing.

Bettors soon learned that the way to prevent the uncertainty caused by the order of wins and loses is to make two “if” bets putting each team first. As opposed to betting $110 on ” Team A if Team B,” you’d bet just $55 on ” Team A if Team B.” and then create a second แทงมวยวันนี้ “if” bet reversing the order of the teams for another $55. The next bet would put Team B first and Team A second. This sort of double bet, reversing the order of the same two teams, is known as an “if/reverse” or sometimes merely a “reverse.”

If both teams win, the end result will be the same just like you played just one “if” bet for $100. You win $50 on Team A in the initial “if bet, and then $50 on Team B, for an overall total win of $100. In the 2nd “if” bet, you win $50 on Team B, and then $50 on Team A, for an overall total win of $100. The 2 “if” bets together cause a total win of $200 when both teams win.

If both teams lose, the end result would also be the same as if you played just one “if” bet for $100. Team A’s loss would run you $55 in the initial “if” combination, and nothing would look at Team B. In the 2nd combination, Team B’s loss would run you $55 and nothing would look at to Team A. You’d lose $55 on each of the bets for an overall total maximum loss in $110 whenever both teams lose.

The difference occurs once the teams split. As opposed to losing $110 when the initial team loses and the 2nd wins, and $10 when the initial team wins but the 2nd loses, in the reverse you will lose $60 on a separate no matter which team wins and which loses. It calculates this way. If Team A loses you will lose $55 on the initial combination, and have nothing going on the winning Team B. In the 2nd combination, you will win $50 on Team B, and have action on Team A for a $55 loss, causing a net loss on the 2nd mix of $5 vig. The increased loss of $55 on the initial “if” bet and $5 on the 2nd “if” bet gives you a mixed loss in $60 on the “reverse.” When Team B loses, you will lose the $5 vig on the initial combination and the $55 on the 2nd combination for the same $60 on the split..

We have accomplished this smaller loss in $60 in place of $110 when the initial team loses with no reduction in the win when both teams win. In both the single $110 “if” bet and the two reversed “if” bets for $55, the win is $200 when both teams cover the spread. The bookmakers would never put themselves at that kind of disadvantage, however. The gain of $50 whenever Team A loses is fully offset by the extra $50 loss ($60 in place of $10) whenever Team B could be the loser. Thus, the “reverse” doesn’t actually save us hardly any money, but it does have the advantage of making the danger more predictable, and avoiding the worry as to which team to put first in the “if” bet.

DON’T, if you’re able to win more than 52.5% or more of one’s games. If you fail to consistently achieve a successful percentage, however, making “if” bets when you bet two teams will save you money.

For the winning bettor, the “if” bet adds an element of luck to your betting equation that doesn’t belong there. If two games are worth betting, then they need to both be bet. Betting on one should not be produced dependent on whether or not you win another. On another hand, for the bettor who includes a negative expectation, the “if” bet will prevent him from betting on the 2nd team whenever the initial team loses. By preventing some bets, the “if” bet saves the negative expectation bettor some vig.

The $10 savings for the “if” bettor results from the fact that he’s not betting the 2nd game when both lose. Compared to the straight bettor, the “if” bettor has an additional cost of $100 when Team A loses and Team B wins, but he saves $110 when Team A and Team B both lose.

The rule for the winning bettor is precisely opposite. Whatever keeps the winning bettor from betting more games is bad, and therefore “if” bets will surely cost the winning handicapper money. When the winning bettor plays fewer games, he has fewer winners. Remember that next time someone tells you that the way to win is to bet fewer games. An intelligent winner never really wants to bet fewer games. Since “if/reverses” workout a similar as “if” bets, they both place the winner at the same disadvantage.

Exceptions to the Rule – Each time a Winner Should Bet Parlays and “IF’s”
Much like all rules, there are exceptions. “If” bets and parlays must be made by successful with a confident expectation in only two circumstances::

When there is no other choice and she must bet either an “if/reverse,” a parlay, or an intro; or
When betting co-dependent propositions.
The only time I can consider that you have no other choice is if you are the most effective man at your friend’s wedding, you are waiting to walk down the aisle, your laptop looked ridiculous in the pocket of one’s tux which means you left it in the car, you simply bet offshore in a deposit account with no credit line, the book includes a $50 minimum phone bet, you prefer two games which overlap over time, you take out your trusty cell 5 minutes before kickoff and 45 seconds before you should walk to the alter with some beastly bride’s maid in a frilly purple dress in your arm, you try to make two $55 bets and suddenly realize you simply have $75 in your account.

Whilst the old philosopher used to say, “Is that what’s troubling you, bucky?” If so, hold your mind up high, put a look on that person, look for the silver lining, and create a $50 “if” bet in your two teams. Obviously you could bet a parlay, but as you might find below, the “if/reverse” is an excellent replacement the parlay if you are winner.

For the winner, the most effective method is straight betting. In case of co-dependent bets, however, as already discussed, there is a huge advantage to betting combinations. With a parlay, the bettor gets the main benefit of increased parlay odds of 13-5 on combined bets which have greater compared to the normal expectation of winning. Since, by definition, co-dependent bets must always be contained within the same game, they need to be produced as “if” bets. With a co-dependent bet our advantage arises from the fact that we make the 2nd bet only IF one of many propositions wins.

It would do us no good to straight bet $110 each on the favourite and the underdog and $110 each on the over and the under. We’d simply lose the vig regardless of how the favorite and over or the underdog and under combinations won. As we’ve seen, if we play two out of 4 possible results in two parlays of the favourite and over and the underdog and under, we are able to net a $160 win when certainly one of our combinations comes in. When to choose the parlay or the “reverse” when coming up with co-dependent combinations is discussed below.

Choosing Between “IF” Bets and Parlays
Predicated on a $110 parlay, which we’ll use for the objective of consistent comparisons, our net parlay win when certainly one of our combinations hits is $176 (the $286 win on the winning parlay without the $110 loss on the losing parlay). In a $110 “reverse” bet our net win would be $180 everytime certainly one of our combinations hits (the $400 win on the winning if/reverse without the $220 loss on the losing if/reverse).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.